It has to be used with caution however. I used it to generate questions and answers for a student quiz bowl contest. This is foundational A&P and for the most part it saved me a ton of laborious pondering about question selection, not to mention typing. It’s easy to get carried away by the ease of what has become a cut and paste exercise, which I nearly did. A few of the answers to questions were egregiously wrong. In one particular Q&A pair, the program insisted that cardiac output is inversely related to blood pressure (the opposite being the case). No matter how I re-worded the question to focus on the simple hemodynamic relationship (not an assumed sympathetic regulatory response, the underlying source of the error I think) the output was the same. So you definitely need to fact check everything.
It has to be used with caution however. I used it to generate questions and answers for a student quiz bowl contest. This is foundational A&P and for the most part it saved me a ton of laborious pondering about question selection, not to mention typing. It’s easy to get carried away by the ease of what has become a cut and paste exercise, which I nearly did. A few of the answers to questions were egregiously wrong. In one particular Q&A pair, the program insisted that cardiac output is inversely related to blood pressure (the opposite being the case). No matter how I re-worded the question to focus on the simple hemodynamic relationship (not an assumed sympathetic regulatory response, the underlying source of the error I think) the output was the same. So you definitely need to fact check everything.